lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a5198b3-0c00-a558-5132-9c38b4bb8795@nod.at>
Date:   Fri, 30 Sep 2016 16:09:09 +0200
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
        David Gstir <david@...ma-star.at>
Subject: Question on ext4 directory hashes in combination with file name
 encryption

Hi,

if I read the ext4 code correctly, you pass encrypted filenames to ext4fs_dirhash().
These filenames are not encoded and therefore binary gibberish.
Isn't this a problem for the ext4 hash functions? My fear is that these hashes are optimized
for ASCII strings and produce more collisions when binary data is used as input.

Thanks,
//richard

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ