lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKamEFzkR+iVxfZKJ_YK41E8a8ta1mQRY7tHfcz-NFwOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Sep 2016 18:29:22 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
        <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Cc:     AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 0/3] WX Checking for arm64

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is an implementation to check for writable and executable pages on arm64.
> This is heavily based on the x86 version which uses the existing page table
> dumping code to do the checking. Some notes:
>
> - The W^X checking is important so this option should become defaut eventually.
>   To make this feasible, the debugfs functionality has been split out as a
>   separate option. I didn't see a good way to make it modular like x86 but
>   an option should be good enough.
> - This checks all page tables registered with ptdump_register. I don't see this
>   being called elsewhere right now though.
> - Once this is merged, I'd like to see about moving DEBUG_WX to the top level
>   instead of having each arch call it in mark_rodata.

Awesome!

Yeah, I think we should take a look at refactoring x86, arm, and arm64
to use a common infrastructure with callbacks. That way other
architectures can gain all these features with just a few callbacks
implemented.

-Kees

>
> Laura Abbott (3):
>   arm64: dump: Make ptdump debugfs a separate option
>   arm64: dump: Make the page table dumping seq_file optional
>   arm64: dump: Add checking for writable and exectuable pages
>
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug        | 34 ++++++++++++++-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h | 25 ++++++++++-
>  arch/arm64/mm/Makefile          |  3 +-
>  arch/arm64/mm/dump.c            | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c             |  2 +
>  arch/arm64/mm/ptdump_debugfs.c  | 33 +++++++++++++++
>  6 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/mm/ptdump_debugfs.c
>
> --
> 2.10.0
>



-- 
Kees Cook
Nexus Security

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ