[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1475353194.1996.3.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2016 13:19:54 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>, linux-metag@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] improve function-level documentation
On Sat, 2016-10-01 at 21:46 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> These patches fix cases where the documentation above a function definition
> is not consistent with the function header. Issues are detected using the
> semantic patch below (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/). Basically, the semantic
> patch parses a file to find comments, then matches each function header,
> and checks that the name and parameter list in the function header are
> compatible with the comment that preceeds it most closely.
Hi Julia.
Would it be possible for a semantic patch to scan for
function definitions where the types do not have
identifiers and update the definitions to match the
declarations?
For instance, given:
<some.h>
int foo(int);
<some.c>
int foo(int bar)
{
return baz;
}
Could coccinelle output:
diff a/some.h b/some.h
[]
-int foo(int);
+int foo(int bar);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists