linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] printk: Shared kernel logging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <64e98e70-7325-3398-100d-a9868fd1bb6a@mentor.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Sep 2016 20:56:38 -0500
From:   Sean Hudson <darknighte@...knighte.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Tim Bird <tim.bird@...ymobile.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] printk: Shared kernel logging

On 9/29/2016 8:36 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Sean Hudson <sean_hudson@...tor.com>
> wrote:
>> This patch set is based on Linus' v4.8-rc8 tag.
>> 
>> This debug feature allows the kernel to use an external buffer and
>> control block for kernel log messages. The feature is controlled by
>> an optional command line parameter. The existing buffer and control
>> block can contain existing log messages from previous boot cycles
>> and/or the bootloader. The command line parameter was chosen for
>> flexibility, cross arch portability, and the ability to dynamically
>> enable/disable this feature. The parameter specifies the address of
>> a control block used to replace the default log buffer. Existing
>> bootloader and kernel log messages are kept, in order, inside the
>> new buffer. After a boot that preserves the buffer contents, a 
>> bootloader can display both kernel and bootloader log entries from
>> multiple, previous boots. It also allows the kernel to display
>> bootloader log entries along with its own messages.
>> 
>> This feature is intended for debug purposes and has no effect
>> unless the command line parameter is specified. Further, it
>> validates the passed control block carefully and if any checks
>> fail, it falls back to the default behaviour. As such, it can be
>> left enabled by default.
>> 
>> Memory Reservation
>> 
>> This feature expects the bootloader to reserve/preserve the shared
>> buffer memory. This reservation needs to prevent the kernel from
>> overwriting the external log control block and log entries. In my
>> testing, I've used the 'fdt' commands in uboot to dynamically
>> inject reserved memory regions via the DT to the kernel.
> 
> Interesting! I wonder if this can be adjusted to incorporate the 
> existing console logging feature in the pstore which does a similar 
> thing? Though pstore doesn't know about bootloader logs, really,
> it's just storing kernel logs in a ring buffer. Maybe this can
> provide a backend to pstore or something, especially since pstore
> initialization happens "too late" for this to really be very
> sensible. It just seems like it'd be nice to have a single persistent
> console memory region...
> 

I don't know that much about pstore.  From your description though, it
sounds feasible to put the two together at some point.  How arch
specific is pstore?

-- 
Sean



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)