[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B542F46C1@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 07:38:44 +0000
From: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] tpm: don't destroy chip device prematurely
>
> > On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 01:24:55PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 01:17:55PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 10:39:31AM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > > > > In tpm_del_char_device device_del is called prior to
> > > > > tpm2_shutdown where it is still used.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fortunately, so far chip->dev was used only for printouts int
> > > > > tpm2_shutdown flow, hence system didn't crash. But with the
> > > > > introduction of runtime power management it will result in
> > > > > shutting down the parent device while it still in use.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 20e0152393b41 ("tpm: fix crash in tpm_tis
> > > > > deinitialization")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
> > > >
> > > > Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > Applied.
> >
> > This patch is wrong, I though the comments were clear. All entry
> > points to find the device must be deleted before we commit to shutting
> down the device.
> >
> > You need to figure out some other way to solve your problem.
>
> Please be more specific regarding flows you think will be wrong with this
> patch, you must agree that the current code is broken even w/o runtime pm.
I've looked to the registration code and it indeed has few more issues
Maybe TPM_CHIP_FLAG_REGISTERED can be used for sealing the access to the device during deregistration, current usage is void.
> Thanks
> Tomas
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging
> tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> tpmdd-devel mailing list
> tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists