[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57F23F71.1060509@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:22:25 +0100
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf probe: check if *ptr2 is zero and not ptr2
On 03/10/16 12:19, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 11:34:31AM +0100, Colin King escreveu:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>>
>> Static anaylsis with cppcheck detected an incorrect comparison:
>> [tools/perf/util/probe-event.c:216]: (warning) Char literal compared with
>> pointer 'ptr2'. Did you intend to dereference it?
>
> What tool was used for that?
cppcheck https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck - I run it nearly daily on
linux-next and linux
>
> - Arnaldo
>
>> Dereference ptr2 for the comparison to fix this.
>>
>> Fixes: 35726d3a4ca9 ("perf probe: Fix to cut off incompatible chars from group name")
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/util/probe-event.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
>> index fcfbef0..d281ae2 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
>> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static int convert_exec_to_group(const char *exec, char **result)
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - for (ptr2 = ptr1; ptr2 != '\0'; ptr2++) {
>> + for (ptr2 = ptr1; *ptr2 != '\0'; ptr2++) {
>> if (!isalnum(*ptr2) && *ptr2 != '_') {
>> *ptr2 = '\0';
>> break;
>> --
>> 2.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists