[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9c595e9-b27f-5c8f-6862-88e5856ab916@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 14:00:35 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...il.com>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Minfei Huang <minfei.hmf@...baba-inc.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: virtio_blk: Clarification for communication difficulties?
>> I hope that our collaboration potential can be still constructive, can't it?
>
> I can understand why others are fed up with this discussion.
Thanks for another feedback.
> Your communication style is exhausting
How did you get this impression?
> and you've pushed into the territory where any benefits of taking
Would you dare to acknowledge benefits from my update suggestions
for any other software components?
> the patches are not worth the time and hassle of dealing with you.
How are the chances that such a conclusion will change?
> I left Reviewed-bys on two patches.
Thanks for your constructive responses.
> Maybe they will get picked up.
I am also curious on how the software evolution will be continued.
> But please think again about what Christian explained. Reviewers and
> maintainers spend time on your patches so make it worth their while.
I risk something just by proposing so many software updates for places
where change opportunities were found by special source code search patterns.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists