[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bdd738c6104cee359264cdc3ed4bf10d668c476a.1475529372.git.shli@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 14:20:25 -0700
From: Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
To: <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <axboe@...com>, <Kernel-team@...com>, <tj@...nel.org>,
<jmoyer@...hat.com>, <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 06/11] blk-throttle: make sure expire time isn't too big
cgroup could be throttled to a limit but when all cgroups cross high
limit, queue enters a higher state and so the group should be throttled
to a higher limit. It's possible the cgroup is sleeping because of
throttle and other cgroups don't dispatch IO any more. In this case,
nobody can trigger current downgrade/upgrade logic. To fix this issue,
we could either set up a timer to wakeup the cgroup if other cgroups are
idle or make sure this cgroup doesn't sleep too long. Setting up a timer
means we must change the timer very frequently. This patch chooses the
latter. Making cgroup sleep time not too big wouldn't change cgroup
bps/iops, but could make it wakeup more frequently, which isn't a big
issue because throtl_slice * 8 is already quite big.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
---
block/blk-throttle.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/blk-throttle.c b/block/blk-throttle.c
index 41b75a3..778de0b 100644
--- a/block/blk-throttle.c
+++ b/block/blk-throttle.c
@@ -589,6 +589,9 @@ static void throtl_dequeue_tg(struct throtl_grp *tg)
static void throtl_schedule_pending_timer(struct throtl_service_queue *sq,
unsigned long expires)
{
+ unsigned long max_expire = jiffies + 8 * throtl_slice;
+ if (time_after(expires, max_expire))
+ expires = max_expire;
mod_timer(&sq->pending_timer, expires);
throtl_log(sq, "schedule timer. delay=%lu jiffies=%lu",
expires - jiffies, jiffies);
--
2.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists