lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161004081958.GB29784@krava>
Date:   Tue, 4 Oct 2016 10:19:58 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
        Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        peterz@...radead.org, maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 16/19] perf, tools: Make alias matching
 case-insensitive

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 09:54:48PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 09:47:06PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 03:24:53PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu escreveu:
> > > From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Make alias matching the events parser case-insensitive. This is useful
> > > with the JSON events. perf uses lower case events, but the CPU manuals
> > > generally use upper case event names. The JSON files use lower
> > > case by default too. But if we search case insensitively then
> > > users can cut-n-paste the upper case event names.
> > > 
> > > So the following works:
> > > 
> > > % perf stat -e BR_INST_EXEC.TAKEN_INDIRECT_NEAR_CALL true
> > > 
> > >  Performance counter stats for 'true':
> > > 
> > >                305      BR_INST_EXEC.TAKEN_INDIRECT_NEAR_CALL
> > > 
> > >        0.000492799 seconds time elapsed
> > 
> > So now trying to figure this out:
> 
> Ok, so this is just another case of bad patch ordering: this uses 'perf
> stat' as the example, but it doesn't work at this point, one needs to go
> to the last patch, apply it and then test it again, when it will work.
> So just moved the last patch to before this one, sigh.

ok, you found it.. sry ;-)

jirka

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ