lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 4 Oct 2016 03:36:53 -0500 (CDT)
From:   Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:     Piotr Kwapulinski <kwapulinski.piotr@...il.com>
cc:     mtk.manpages@...il.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
        vbabka@...e.cz, rientjes@...gle.com, mhocko@...nel.org,
        mgorman@...hsingularity.net, liangchen.linux@...il.com,
        nzimmer@....com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, riel@...hat.com,
        lee.schermerhorn@...com, jmarchan@...hat.com, joe@...ches.com,
        corbet@....net, iamyooon@...il.com, n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-man@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] man/set_mempolicy.2,mbind.2: add MPOL_LOCAL NUMA
 memory policy documentation

Well the difference between MPOL_DEFAULT and MPOL_LOCAL may be confusing.
Mention somewhere in the MPOL_LOCAL description that the policy with
MPOL_DEFAULT reverts to the policy of the process and MPOL_LOCAL to try to
allocate local? Note that MPOL_LOCAL also will not be local if it just
happens that the local node is overallocated. This is usually confusing
for newcomers. The node/zone reclaim must be activated in order to allow
node local reclaim that results in a node local allocation.



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ