lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 03:03:25 -0600 From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com> To: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@...solutions.net> Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...nel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: suppress sparse warning in copy_to_user() >>> On 04.10.16 at 10:49, <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote: >> > > If that was the case, everyone should have seen such warnings >> > > from the day the original patch got introduced. >> > >> > Only if they run sparse. Clearly people don't, or we wouldn't have >> > a history of a ton of such problems, e.g. >> >> No - you say "which gcc declares with (void *, int type) prototype". >> If that was the case, there would need to be a warning. > > There would need to be a warning when? If the declaration used "void *" instead of "const void *". Jan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists