[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbAF5sOf6FJTqT5i9xLm_3ykc3YNu71s5aobHpzKKGo+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:17:45 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>, Yong Li <yong.b.li@...el.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: add a comment explaining the need for a
lockdep subclass
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:54:15AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> This is a follow-up to commit 559b46990e76 ("gpio: pca953x: fix an
>> incorrect lockdep warning"). The reason for calling
>> lockdep_set_subclass() in pca953x_probe() is not explained in
>> the code.
>>
>> Add a comment describing the problem, partial solution and required
>> future extensions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
>
> Linus, because of dependencies, I should probably pick it up?
Yes Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Sorry was travelling.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists