[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af0d75ef-734d-2cdf-05d8-bf4cd9c59ef9@sandisk.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 07:24:52 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
To: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@...fitbricks.com>,
"dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
"sean.hefty@...el.com" <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
"hal.rosenstock@...il.com" <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>
CC: "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] IB/srp: export reset-host via sysfs
On 10/04/16 07:00, Gioh Kim wrote:
> Standard SCSI device has host_reset sysfs interface.
> This patch exports the host_reset interface for upper layer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@...fitbricks.com>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> index 3322ed7..92e6c3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> @@ -2628,6 +2628,15 @@ static int srp_reset_device(struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd)
> return SUCCESS;
> }
>
> +static int srp_scsi_host_reset(struct Scsi_Host *shost, int reset_type)
> +{
> + struct srp_target_port *target = host_to_target(shost);
> +
> + shost_printk(KERN_EMERG, target->scsi_host, PFX "SRP reset_host called\n");
> +
> + return srp_reconnect_rport(target->rport);
> +}
> +
> static int srp_reset_host(struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd)
> {
> struct srp_target_port *target = host_to_target(scmnd->device->host);
> @@ -2858,6 +2867,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template srp_template = {
> .use_clustering = ENABLE_CLUSTERING,
> .shost_attrs = srp_host_attrs,
> .track_queue_depth = 1,
> + .host_reset = srp_scsi_host_reset,
> };
Hello Gioh,
A patch description should not only explain what is changed but also why
a change is considered useful. Why do you think it would be useful to
allow users to trigger a call of srp_reconnect_rport() through sysfs
instead of using the functionality that is already available through
sysfs, namely removing a SCSI host and reconnecting?
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists