linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGb2v67wk_DANTyzaxTM6Stgh-u2kZXn_kjb0vbWDYUd-DUxGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Oct 2016 10:32:12 +0800
From:   Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl bindings

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> The generic pin configuration and multiplexing should be preferred now,
> even though we still support the old one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt
> index 69617220c5d6..e8b7cf64fdf1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt
> @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ pins it needs, and how they should be configured, with regard to muxer
>  configuration, drive strength and pullups. If one of these options is
>  not set, its actual value will be unspecified.
>
> +This driver supports the generic pin multiplexing and configuration
> +bindings.

Should we list which options are supported? We don't support them all.

ChenYu

> +
> +*** Deprecated pin configuration and multiplexing binding
> +
>  Required subnode-properties:
>
>  - allwinner,pins: List of strings containing the pin name.
> --
> git-series 0.8.10