lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 4 Oct 2016 12:19:48 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression in next with ext4 oops

* Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> [161004 12:08]:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 03:59:15PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > Jan is wrong - we do have per-struct-file serialization for getdents()
> > et.al.  It might be a race between getdents() on *different* struct
> > file for the same directory, but ->private_data is not a problem.
> 
> So the rb_insert_color() OOPS seems to indicate that the rbtree has
> gotten corrupted, and it hangs off of private_data.

Yes so it seems..

> And I've just checked the ext4.git tree and I can't see any changes in
> the dev branch (which I was just about to push to Linus) that would
> impact the readdir path for non-encrypted directories.  So if it's a
> race on ->private_data I'm not sure what else might be going wrong.
> 
> Hmm... Tony, what version was the last good version where it wouldn't
> reproduce for you?  v4.7?   Does it reproduce for you on v4.8?

Well I just found it's caused by my commit d776fc86b82f ("wlcore:
sdio: Populate config firmware data") and has nothing to do with
ext4, see the mail I just posted.

> Also, would you mind seeing if you can reproduce it on the dev
> branch of the ext4 git tree?
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git dev

Seems like there's nothing wrong with ext4, this is probably some
memory corruption issue.

Thanks everybody for help and sorry for the false ext4 alert.

Regards,

Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ