[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XGwc8k-OctcKmdJoFK44v86qegAAFDOpN71wpciA=3Tg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 15:14:49 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: arch counter doesn't tick in
system suspend
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org> wrote:
> The "arm,no-tick-in-suspend" property was introduced to note
> implementations where the system counter does not quite follow the ARM
> specification that it "must be implemented in an always-on power
> domain".
>
> Particularly, RK3399's counter stops ticking when we switch from the
> 24MHz clock to the 32KHz clock in low-power suspend, so let's mark it as
> such.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
> ---
> v2: new in v2
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists