[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <368810F9-519C-44B5-85D4-1815273438BF@holtmann.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 13:14:53 +0200
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: trivial@...nel.org, "Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bluetooth.h: __ variants of u8 and friends are not
neccessary inside kernel
Hi Pavel,
> bluetooth.h is not part of user API, so __ variants are not neccessary
> here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
>
> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h b/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
> index bfd1590..aea0371 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
> @@ -60,8 +60,8 @@
>
> #define BT_SECURITY 4
> struct bt_security {
> - __u8 level;
> - __u8 key_size;
> + u8 level;
> + u8 key_size;
> };
> #define BT_SECURITY_SDP 0
> #define BT_SECURITY_LOW 1
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ struct bt_security {
>
> #define BT_POWER 9
> struct bt_power {
> - __u8 force_active;
> + u8 force_active;
> };
> #define BT_POWER_FORCE_ACTIVE_OFF 0
> #define BT_POWER_FORCE_ACTIVE_ON 1
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ struct bt_power {
>
> #define BT_VOICE 11
> struct bt_voice {
> - __u16 setting;
> + u16 setting;
> };
>
> #define BT_VOICE_TRANSPARENT 0x0003
> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static inline const char *state_to_string(int state)
>
> /* BD Address */
> typedef struct {
> - __u8 b[6];
> + u8 b[6];
> } __packed bdaddr_t;
>
can you leave these out please. They are meant to become UAPI eventually.
> /* BD Address type */
> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ typedef struct {
> #define BDADDR_LE_PUBLIC 0x01
> #define BDADDR_LE_RANDOM 0x02
>
> -static inline bool bdaddr_type_is_valid(__u8 type)
> +static inline bool bdaddr_type_is_valid(u8 type)
> {
> switch (type) {
> case BDADDR_BREDR:
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static inline bool bdaddr_type_is_valid(__u8 type)
> return false;
> }
>
> -static inline bool bdaddr_type_is_le(__u8 type)
> +static inline bool bdaddr_type_is_le(u8 type)
> {
> switch (type) {
> case BDADDR_LE_PUBLIC:
> @@ -278,15 +278,16 @@ struct sock *bt_accept_dequeue(struct sock *parent, struct socket *newsock);
>
> /* Skb helpers */
> struct l2cap_ctrl {
> - __u8 sframe:1,
> + u8 sframe:1,
> poll:1,
> final:1,
> fcs:1,
> sar:2,
> super:2;
> - __u16 reqseq;
> - __u16 txseq;
> - __u8 retries;
> +
> + u16 reqseq;
> + u16 txseq;
> + u8 retries;
> __le16 psm;
> bdaddr_t bdaddr;
> struct l2cap_chan *chan;
> @@ -302,7 +303,7 @@ typedef void (*hci_req_complete_skb_t)(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 status,
> #define HCI_REQ_SKB BIT(1)
>
> struct hci_ctrl {
> - __u16 opcode;
> + u16 opcode;
> u8 req_flags;
> u8 req_event;
> union {
> @@ -312,10 +313,10 @@ struct hci_ctrl {
> };
>
> struct bt_skb_cb {
> - __u8 pkt_type;
> - __u8 force_active;
> - __u16 expect;
> - __u8 incoming:1;
> + u8 pkt_type;
> + u8 force_active;
> + u16 expect;
> + u8 incoming:1;
> union {
> struct l2cap_ctrl l2cap;
> struct hci_ctrl hci;
> @@ -365,7 +366,7 @@ out:
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -int bt_to_errno(__u16 code);
> +int bt_to_errno(u16 code);
The rest looks good to me.
Regards
Marcel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists