linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Staging/IIO driver patches for 4.9-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFyv4poNys-0Ow0OO75fC+MHmp-kpRAKsvp_QBUCq+NQ=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Oct 2016 14:47:52 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Linux Driver Project <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Staging/IIO driver patches for 4.9-rc1

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Should I respin the merge request with the above information in it?

This is sufficient - I just need to know (and want to document) the
reasons for the merges I do.

In fact, I'd love it if your pull requests in general were a bit more
about what is going on, but for things like the greybus thing I
*really* needed it.

            Linus