linux-kernel - [PATCH 8/9] x86/fpu: remove __fpregs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1475627678-20788-9-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue,  4 Oct 2016 20:34:37 -0400
From:   riel@...hat.com
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com, luto@...nel.org,
        pa@...or.com, bp@...e.de
Subject: [PATCH 8/9] x86/fpu: remove __fpregs_(de)activate

From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>

Now that fpregs_activate and fpregs_deactivate do nothing except
call the double underscored versions of themselves, we can get
rid of the double underscore version.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h | 25 +++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h
index d2cfe16dd9fa..aa7a117b43f8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h
@@ -509,8 +509,11 @@ static inline int fpregs_state_valid(struct fpu *fpu, unsigned int cpu)
 	return fpu == this_cpu_read_stable(fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx) && cpu == fpu->last_cpu;
 }
 
-
-static inline void __fpregs_deactivate(struct fpu *fpu)
+/*
+ * These generally need preemption protection to work,
+ * do try to avoid using these on their own.
+ */
+static inline void fpregs_deactivate(struct fpu *fpu)
 {
 	WARN_ON_FPU(!fpu->fpregs_active);
 
@@ -519,7 +522,7 @@ static inline void __fpregs_deactivate(struct fpu *fpu)
 	trace_x86_fpu_regs_deactivated(fpu);
 }
 
-static inline void __fpregs_activate(struct fpu *fpu)
+static inline void fpregs_activate(struct fpu *fpu)
 {
 	WARN_ON_FPU(fpu->fpregs_active);
 
@@ -544,20 +547,6 @@ static inline int fpregs_active(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * These generally need preemption protection to work,
- * do try to avoid using these on their own.
- */
-static inline void fpregs_activate(struct fpu *fpu)
-{
-	__fpregs_activate(fpu);
-}
-
-static inline void fpregs_deactivate(struct fpu *fpu)
-{
-	__fpregs_deactivate(fpu);
-}
-
-/*
  * FPU state switching for scheduling.
  *
  * This is a two-stage process:
@@ -595,7 +584,7 @@ switch_fpu_prepare(struct fpu *old_fpu, struct fpu *new_fpu, int cpu)
 
 		/* Don't change CR0.TS if we just switch! */
 		if (fpu.preload) {
-			__fpregs_activate(new_fpu);
+			fpregs_activate(new_fpu);
 			trace_x86_fpu_regs_activated(new_fpu);
 			prefetch(&new_fpu->state);
 		}
-- 
2.7.4