linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.7 114/141] lib/test_hash.c: fix warning in preprocessor symbol evaluation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20161006074453.589949680@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu,  6 Oct 2016 10:29:10 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        George Spelvin <linux@...encehorizons.net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.7 114/141] lib/test_hash.c: fix warning in preprocessor symbol evaluation

4.7-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>

commit e6173ba42bbdba05fd4f3021c0beda0506271507 upstream.

Some versions of gcc don't like tests for the value of an undefined
preprocessor symbol, even in the #else branch of an #ifndef:

    lib/test_hash.c:224:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32" is not defined [-Wundef]
     #elif HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 != 1
	   ^
    lib/test_hash.c:229:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32" is not defined [-Wundef]
     #elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 != 1
	   ^
    lib/test_hash.c:234:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64" is not defined [-Wundef]
     #elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 != 1
	   ^

Seen with gcc 4.9, not seen with 4.1.2.

Change the logic to only check the value inside an #ifdef to fix this.

Fixes: 468a9428521e7d00 ("<linux/hash.h>: Add support for architecture-specific functions")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160829214952.1334674-4-arnd@arndb.de
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Acked-by: George Spelvin <linux@...encehorizons.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 lib/test_hash.c |   24 +++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/lib/test_hash.c
+++ b/lib/test_hash.c
@@ -219,21 +219,27 @@ test_hash_init(void)
 	}
 
 	/* Issue notices about skipped tests. */
-#ifndef HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32
-	pr_info("__hash_32() has no arch implementation to test.");
-#elif HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 != 1
+#ifdef HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32
+#if HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 != 1
 	pr_info("__hash_32() is arch-specific; not compared to generic.");
 #endif
-#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32
-	pr_info("hash_32() has no arch implementation to test.");
-#elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 != 1
+#else
+	pr_info("__hash_32() has no arch implementation to test.");
+#endif
+#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32
+#if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 != 1
 	pr_info("hash_32() is arch-specific; not compared to generic.");
 #endif
-#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64
-	pr_info("hash_64() has no arch implementation to test.");
-#elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 != 1
+#else
+	pr_info("hash_32() has no arch implementation to test.");
+#endif
+#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64
+#if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 != 1
 	pr_info("hash_64() is arch-specific; not compared to generic.");
 #endif
+#else
+	pr_info("hash_64() has no arch implementation to test.");
+#endif
 
 	pr_notice("%u tests passed.", tests);