[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <69fc2ab2-ddde-068f-1aca-398aa4ce811e@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 11:52:03 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@...e.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
Tomasz Majchrzak <tomasz.majchrzak@...el.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: [PATCH 52/54] md/raid10: Replace a seq_printf() call by seq_puts() in
raid10_status()
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 21:41:09 +0200
The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
drivers/md/raid10.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index 82d79f5..554b6d2 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -1502,7 +1502,7 @@ static void raid10_status(struct seq_file *seq, struct mddev *mddev)
seq_printf(seq, "%s", rdev && test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) ? "U" : "_");
}
rcu_read_unlock();
- seq_printf(seq, "]");
+ seq_puts(seq, "]");
}
/* check if there are enough drives for
--
2.10.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists