[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161006083642.6a28a629@jawa>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 08:36:42 +0200
From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>
To: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@...adex.com>
Cc: <shawnguo@...nel.org>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
mark.rutland@....com, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
l.majewski@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stefan@...er.ch, robh+dt@...nel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
fabio.estevam@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Lothar Wassmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] pwm: core: make the PWM_POLARITY flag in DTB
optional
Hi Bhuvanchandra,
> From: Lothar Wassmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
>
> Change the pwm chip driver registration, so that a chip driver that
> supports polarity inversion can still be used with DTBs that don't
> provide the 'PWM_POLARITY' flag.
>
> This is done to provide polarity inversion support for the pwm-imx
> driver without having to modify all existing DTS files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lothar Wassmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
> Signed-off-by: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@...adex.com>
> Suggested-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/core.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
> index 195373e..aae8db3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
> @@ -137,9 +137,14 @@ of_pwm_xlate_with_flags(struct pwm_chip *pc,
> const struct of_phandle_args *args) {
> struct pwm_device *pwm;
>
> + /* check, whether the driver supports a third cell for flags
> */ if (pc->of_pwm_n_cells < 3)
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> + /* flags in the third cell are optional */
> + if (args->args_count < 2)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> if (args->args[0] >= pc->npwm)
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> @@ -149,10 +154,12 @@ of_pwm_xlate_with_flags(struct pwm_chip *pc,
> const struct of_phandle_args *args)
> pwm->args.period = args->args[1];
>
> - if (args->args[2] & PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED)
> - pwm->args.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED;
> - else
> - pwm->args.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
> + if (args->args_count > 2) {
> + if (args->args[2] & PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED)
> + pwm_set_polarity(pwm, PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
here we should set pwm->args.polarity, since
the pwm_set_polarity() calls pwm_apply_state()
which requires duty_cycle and period to be set.
In this particular moment it is not yet set and
polarity is not properly configured.
Patch fixing this will be sent as a reply to this e-mail. Please just
squash it and test on your platform.
Best regards,
Ćukasz Majewski
> + else
> + pwm_set_polarity(pwm, PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL);
> + }
>
> return pwm;
> }
> @@ -163,9 +170,14 @@ of_pwm_simple_xlate(struct pwm_chip *pc, const
> struct of_phandle_args *args) {
> struct pwm_device *pwm;
>
> + /* sanity check driver support */
> if (pc->of_pwm_n_cells < 2)
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> + /* all cells are required */
> + if (args->args_count != pc->of_pwm_n_cells)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> if (args->args[0] >= pc->npwm)
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> @@ -672,13 +684,6 @@ struct pwm_device *of_pwm_get(struct device_node
> *np, const char *con_id) goto put;
> }
>
> - if (args.args_count != pc->of_pwm_n_cells) {
> - pr_debug("%s: wrong #pwm-cells for %s\n",
> np->full_name,
> - args.np->full_name);
> - pwm = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> - goto put;
> - }
> -
> pwm = pc->of_xlate(pc, &args);
> if (IS_ERR(pwm))
> goto put;
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists