linux-kernel - Re: [GIT] Networking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 05 Oct 2016 20:26:24 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     pablo@...filter.org
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, liping.zhang@...eadtrum.com
Subject: Re: [GIT] Networking

From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 02:09:45 +0200

> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 03:37:17PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> >
>> > I have been carrying the following merge fix patch (for the merge of
>> > the net-next tree with Linus' tree) for a while now which seems to have
>> > got missed:
>> 
>> Ugh. It doesn't seem to be a merge error, because that double iph
>> assignment came from the original patch that introduced this function:
>> commit ddc8b6027ad0 ("netfilter: introduce nft_set_pktinfo_{ipv4,
>> ipv6}_validate()").
>> 
>> So I wouldn't call it a merge error - it just looks like a bug in the
>> network layer. So I'm not going to apply your patch even though it
>> looks plausible to me, simply because it's outside my area of
>> expertise.
>> 
>> David? Pablo?
> 
> This looks good, please take it so we speed up things.
> 
> Acked-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>

Applied.