[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c158cfe0-d8d8-e433-0cea-2ef1fc51e48b@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 19:49:12 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@...e.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
Tomasz Majchrzak <tomasz.majchrzak@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 37/54] md/raid5: Replace a seq_printf() call by seq_puts()
in raid5_status()
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
>>> []
>>>> @@ -7044,7 +7044,7 @@ static void raid5_status(struct seq_file *seq, struct mddev *mddev)
>>>> rdev && test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) ? "U" : "_");
>>>> }
>>>> rcu_read_unlock();
>>>> - seq_printf (seq, "]");
>>>> + seq_puts(seq, "]");
>>> seq_putc
>> How do you think about the possibility that the script "checkpatch.pl" can also point
>> such a source code transformation out directly?
>
> Why don't _you_ try to implement that in checkpatch instead?
How are the chances that any other software developer would be quicker (than me) for such
an addition because of more practical knowledge for the programming language "Perl"?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists