lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1475737676.3224.1.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:07:56 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        "Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bluetooth.h: __ variants of u8 and friends are not
 neccessary inside kernel

On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 09:02 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> I believe you are wrong. bit addressability does not matter, cpu can
> definitely get the bit values.
> 
> u8 foo:1;
> u8 bar:1;
> u8 baz:1;
> 
> should take 1 byte, where
> 
> bool foo, bar, baz;
> 
> will take more like 3.

Definitely true.

There is only one single bitfield foo here though
so what you wrote doesn't apply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ