[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161006194415.bpl5zylqmgy4izyc@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 21:44:15 +0200
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...more.it>, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Kernel-team@...com, jmoyer@...hat.com,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 00/11] block-throttle: add .high limit
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 01:49:43PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Paolo, CFQ is legacy now and if we can come up with a proportional
> IO mechanism which works reasonably well with fast devices using
> blk-mq interfaces, that will be much more interesting.
CFQ is not legacy yet. Until we've got scheduling in blk-mq and
converted all the existing users over to blk-mq it's still going
to be something that affects real, production systems that don't
have any other meaningful option.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (456 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists