[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09f3f798-5b9b-df84-e864-0593ee74e0cc@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 15:08:53 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: docs: Fixing "sphinxify coccinelle.txt"?
>>> Information from a commit like "docs: sphinxify coccinelle.txt and add it
>>> to dev-tools" caught also my software development attention.
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/Documentation/coccinelle.txt?id=4b9033a33494ec9154d63e706e9e47f7eb3fd59e
>>>
>>> Did an other information from a comment become outdated in the script "coccicheck"
>>> because of such changes for the documentation format?
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/scripts/coccicheck?id=c802e87fbe2d4dd58982d01b3c39bc5a781223aa#n4
>>
>> How about submitting a patch to fix the problem?
>
> Is the published commit (from 2016-08-08 / 2016-08-18) generally questionable
> as I see it by the interface "cgit" at the moment?
>
> * Does this one contain only the deletion of the file "Documentation/coccinelle.txt"?
It seems that I got an inappropriate impression from this kind of
data display alone.
The display for the changed file name contains only the desired addition.
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst?id=4b9033a33494ec9154d63e706e9e47f7eb3fd59e
> I find another data display also interesting and more promising.
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9269973/
>
> * Should this patch about the desired file format conversion become available
> also by the other known interfaces?
The interface "cgit v0.12" does not indicate the involved "renaming" (similarity index 56%)
so far which can be better seen in the downloadable patch file.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists