lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57F7A14A.3070207@bfs.de>
Date:   Fri, 07 Oct 2016 15:21:14 +0200
From:   walter harms <wharms@....de>
To:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
CC:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@...e.com>,
        Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: md-cluster: Delete unnecessary braces in unlock_all_bitmaps()



Am 07.10.2016 10:37, schrieb SF Markus Elfring:
>>> Do not use curly brackets at one source code place
>>> where a single statement should be sufficient.
>>
>> The original style was correct and this is wrong.  I have explained this before.
> 
> Did I change a bit too much in the proposed step according to the following
> update suggestion?
> 
> elfring@...ne:~/Projekte/Linux/next-patched> git checkout d6385db94196b253ae5eb3678fa95cdf1f839fcc && scripts/checkpatch.pl --types BRACES -f drivers/md/md-cluster.c
> …
> WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
> #1228: FILE: drivers/md/md-cluster.c:1228:
> +			if (cinfo->other_bitmap_lockres[i]) {
> +				lockres_free(cinfo->other_bitmap_lockres[i]);
> +			}
> …
> 
> 
> How do you think about to adjust this source code place a bit?
> 

perhaps we can agree to delete the if() block ?

static void lockres_free(struct dlm_lock_resource *res)
{
        int ret;

       if (!res)
                return;

....


@marcus: is can not send mail to you sf.net adresse because sf.net
         mark my domain als spam (note: nobody else does)

re,
 wh


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ