lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161007035649.GA17183@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 7 Oct 2016 05:56:49 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE needs a warning

On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 04:53:20PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On a whim, I decided to turn on CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE on
> Fedora rawhide since it sounded harmless enough. It spewed warnings
> and panicked some systems. Clearly it's  doing its job
> well of finding drivers that can't handle remove properly and I
> underestimated it.

Yes, we knew it was going to find bugs, you were brave :)

> I was expecting to maybe find a driver or two.
> Can we get stronger Kconfig text indicating that this shouldn't be
> turned on lightly? I'll be turning the option off in Fedora but sending
> out reports from what was found.

Care to send a patch with the wording change you would have found better
to warn yourself not to do this?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ