[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1475873387.1945.23.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 13:49:47 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Harman Kalra <harman4linux@...il.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.co
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Staging: i4l: Warning "Prefer "pr_debug over
printk(KERN_DEBUG... " fixed
On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 22:27 +0530, Harman Kalra wrote:
> Warning "Prefer "pr_debug over printk(KERN_DEBUG... " and "few line more than 80 character" fixed
The commit subject and message doesn't match the code change.
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/i4l/icn/icn.h b/drivers/staging/i4l/icn/icn.h
[]
> @@ -54,7 +54,8 @@
>
> /* some useful macros for debugging */
> #ifdef ICN_DEBUG_PORT
> -#define OUTB_P(v, p) {printk(KERN_DEBUG "icn: outb_p(0x%02x,0x%03x)\n", v, p); outb_p(v, p);}
> +#define OUTB_P(v, p) \
> + {printk(KERN_DEBUG "icn: outb_p(0x%02x,0x%03x)\n", v, p); outb_p(v, p); }
This would be better with a do {...} while (0) guard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists