lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1475819136-24358-3-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri,  7 Oct 2016 14:45:34 +0900
From:   Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Sangseok Lee <sangseok.lee@....com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] mm: prevent double decrease of nr_reserved_highatomic

There is race between page freeing and unreserved highatomic.

 CPU 0				    CPU 1

    free_hot_cold_page
      mt = get_pfnblock_migratetype
      set_pcppage_migratetype(page, mt)
    				    unreserve_highatomic_pageblock
    				    spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock)
    				    move_freepages_block
    				    set_pageblock_migratetype(page)
    				    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock)
      free_pcppages_bulk
        __free_one_page(mt) <- mt is stale

By above race, a page on CPU 0 could go non-highorderatomic free list
since the pageblock's type is changed. By that, unreserve logic of
highorderatomic can decrease reserved count on a same pageblock
several times and then it will make mismatch between
nr_reserved_highatomic and the number of reserved pageblock.

So, this patch verifies whether the pageblock is highatomic or not
and decrease the count only if the pageblock is highatomic.

Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index e7cbb3cc22fa..d110cd640264 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2133,13 +2133,25 @@ static void unreserve_highatomic_pageblock(const struct alloc_context *ac)
 				continue;
 
 			/*
-			 * It should never happen but changes to locking could
-			 * inadvertently allow a per-cpu drain to add pages
-			 * to MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC while unreserving so be safe
-			 * and watch for underflows.
+			 * In page freeing path, migratetype change is racy so
+			 * we can counter several free pages in a pageblock
+			 * in this loop althoug we changed the pageblock type
+			 * from highatomic to ac->migratetype. So we should
+			 * adjust the count once.
 			 */
-			zone->nr_reserved_highatomic -= min(pageblock_nr_pages,
-				zone->nr_reserved_highatomic);
+			if (get_pageblock_migratetype(page) ==
+							MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC) {
+				/*
+				 * It should never happen but changes to
+				 * locking could inadvertently allow a per-cpu
+				 * drain to add pages to MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC
+				 * while unreserving so be safe and watch for
+				 * underflows.
+				 */
+				zone->nr_reserved_highatomic -= min(
+						pageblock_nr_pages,
+						zone->nr_reserved_highatomic);
+			}
 
 			/*
 			 * Convert to ac->migratetype and avoid the normal
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ