[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e8a03cb-2ae0-c8e3-7910-97ad05903709@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 09:19:28 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scripts/coccicheck: Update for a comment?
> Either you send the patch, or I will send the patch, when I have time,
> with no credit to you.
I am curious when "the time" will be appropriate.
> I'm not an expert on all of the future plans for the documentation,
I assumed that you know a bit more about the corresponding software evolution
than me.
> The only think I know is where the file is now, and that the file
> is perfectly readable in its rst format, and thus it seems
> quite all right to reference it.
I can agree to such an information in principle.
> If the situation change in the future, we can have another patch
> in the future.
I would appreciate another clarification:
Do I overlook any commit for the discussed source file anyhow?
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/log/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists