[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161008140357.GC3533@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 16:03:57 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
shuah.kh@...sung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/10] 4.8.1-stable review
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 03:26:04PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> stable-rc boot: 479 boots: 4 failed, 183 passed with 292 offline (v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab)
>
> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab/
> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab/
>
> Tree: stable-rc
> Branch: local/linux-4.8.y
> Git Describe: v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab
> Git Commit: e141008f62abab72c15b093d97a88f37c8cd7096
> Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> Tested: 86 unique boards, 23 SoC families, 33 builds out of 206
>
> Boot Failures Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.8-11-ge141008f62ab&fail
>
> arm:
>
> mxs_defconfig:
> imx23-olinuxino: 1 failed lab
>
> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n:
> imx6q-sabrelite: 1 failed lab
>
> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y:
> vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1: 1 failed lab
> vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7: 1 failed lab
How does this compare to 4.8.0?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists