[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161008160112.GB25893@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 19:01:12 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Cc: "tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] tmp/tpm_crb: implement runtime pm for tpm_crb
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 01:37:31PM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 02:59:39PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > > From: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
> > >
> > > Utilize runtime_pm for driving tpm crb idle states.
> > > The framework calls cmd_ready from the pm_runtime_resume handler and
> > > go idle from the pm_runtime_suspend handler.
> > > The TPM framework should wake the device before transmit and receive.
> > > In case the runtime_pm framework is not compiled in or enabled, the
> > > device will be in the permanent ready state.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
> >
> > I would rather want the fix as a separate patch to make review + testing easier
> > (without and with). Thanks.
>
> But you've dropped the patches, so I've resent them.
> Can you do the diff yourself, just branch it off. it's really just few lines
Nope. I have only dropped the workaround.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists