linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 04/18] x86/intel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 8 Oct 2016 21:52:50 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:     Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@...el.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>,
        David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>,
        Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        Sai Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>,
        Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/18] x86/intel_rdt: Feature discovery

On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 01:54:54PM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> > I think these #defines are specific to Intel.  I would prefer if we
> > have _INTEL_ somewhere in them.

We don't generally add vendor names to those defines. Even more so if
the 0x0... leaf range is Intel-specific anyway.

> Is adding "Intel" in comment good?

I don't see any need if the leaf has already this heading:

/* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000007:0 (ebx), word 9 */

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--