[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQX6e7zv8C_zewcHiyjAes1CcBaMhSBzjoKQrixsEMAiNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 22:33:33 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/acpi: Prevent LAPIC id 0xff from being accounted
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:28 AM, tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
>> index 32a7d70..6d35baf 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
>> @@ -233,6 +233,9 @@ acpi_parse_lapic(struct acpi_subtable_header * header, const unsigned long end)
>>
>> acpi_table_print_madt_entry(header);
>>
>> + if (processor->id >= 0xff)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> /*
>> * We need to register disabled CPU as well to permit
>> * counting disabled CPUs. This allows us to size
>
>
> some thing is wrong:
>
> [ 71.787437] ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0xff] lapic_id[0xff] disabled)
> [ 71.799681] ACPI: Error parsing LAPIC/X2APIC entries
> [ 71.809934] ACPI: Invalid BIOS MADT, disabling ACPI
>
> looks like should change
> return -EINVAL ;
> ==>
> return 0;
also processor->id is u8,
so the patch should be:
>> + if (processor->id == 0xff)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists