[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:28:37 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@...e.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
Tomasz Majchrzak <tomasz.majchrzak@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: md/raid1: Improve another size determination in setup_conf()
> I am ignoring Markus patches
It's a pity that you chose such a reaction.
> and have told him that he should focus on bug fixes.
I find that I suggest to improve something. Could you admit a few times
that I found a "bug" you care also about at other source code places?
> These patches don't add any value
Can it be that you express a lower value for the Linux coding style here
than desired as there might be other concerns behind such negative feedback?
> and regularly introduce bugs.
How do you think about to discuss corresponding facts further?
> That said, "sizeof(*ptr)" is sort of official style.
When this implementation detail is so official, I wonder then why some
software developers can become "special" about the proposed update step
like for this module.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists