linux-kernel - Re: md/raid1: Improve another size determination in setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Oct 2016 16:20:51 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>
Cc:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
        linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@...e.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
        Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>,
        Neil Brown <neilb@...e.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
        Tomasz Majchrzak <tomasz.majchrzak@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: md/raid1: Improve another size determination in setup_conf()

>> Can it "accidentally" happen that some of them will be really worth
>> also for your precious software development attention?
> 
> Given that none of your patches fix any real bugs

Are there any ones which would eventually become "real" also for you?


> and you do your best to ignore any guidance you have been given,

I dare occasionally to find reasons out for a specific disagreement.


> I do reject your entire patchset and you can consider this a NACK for this entire series.

Thanks for your feedback.

I am still curious if any other software developers or source code reviewers
would dare to express an other opinion for one of the shown update possibilities.

Regards,
Markus