[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 21:26:50 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
"moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER"
<tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/3] tpm_crb: expand struct
crb_control_area to struct crb_regs
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:25:11AM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> I addition I believe it should be always on offset FED4_0xxxh by the
> Spec, so all this arithmetic is a bit of overkill.
We don't have any hard coded addresses in the drivers - that seems
very inappropriate these days..
Is that address really not discoverable via ACPI somehow?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists