[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161010205926.GA16967@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 13:59:26 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: "linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
Masahiko Iwamoto <iwamoto@...ied-telesis.co.jp>,
Joshua Scott <Joshua.Scott@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
Kevin Tsai <ktsai@...ellamicro.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] hwmon: Add tc654 driver
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 08:08:14PM +0000, Chris Packham wrote:
> On 10/11/2016 02:22 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> + if (val)
> >> > + data->config |= TC654_REG_CONFIG_DUTYC;
> >> > + else
> >> > + data->config &= ~TC654_REG_CONFIG_DUTYC;
> > I just realized that this won't work as intended. Problem is that you
> > only fill data->config when reading an attribute. So, if a set function
> > is called prior to reading an attribute, data->config will be 0, and
> > you end up overwriting the original configuration.
> >
>
> Should I just read it in the probe function or fill it in with the
> documented hardware defaults?
Reading it would be better - that leaves the option open that it was configured
by ROMMON or BIOS.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists