[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161011145706.5028-1-chao@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 22:56:59 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: jaegeuk@...nel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] f2fs: clear nlink if fail to add_link
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
We don't need to keep incomplete created inode in cache, so if we fail to
add link into directory during new inode creation, it's better to set
nlink of inode to zero, then we can evict inode immediately. Otherwise
release of nid belong to inode will be delayed until inode cache is being
shrunk, it may cause a seemingly endless loop while allocating free nids
in time of testing generic/269 case of fstest suit.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/inode.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
index d736989..34ae03c 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
@@ -384,6 +384,8 @@ retry:
f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
err = remove_inode_page(inode);
f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
+ if (err == -ENOENT)
+ err = 0;
}
/* give more chances, if ENOMEM case */
@@ -424,6 +426,12 @@ void handle_failed_inode(struct inode *inode)
struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
struct node_info ni;
+ /*
+ * clear nlink of inode in order to release resource of inode
+ * immediately.
+ */
+ clear_nlink(inode);
+
/* don't make bad inode, since it becomes a regular file. */
unlock_new_inode(inode);
--
2.10.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists