[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161011194859.GA11477@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 22:48:59 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc: g@...el.com, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
"moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER"
<tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tpm_crb: map locality registers
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:29:22PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:21:00PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:01:43AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:23:04PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > In order to provide access to locality registers, this commits adds
> > > > mapping of the head of the CRB registers, which are located right
> > > > before the control area.
> > >
> > > I think you should squash this into the prior patch, no sense in
> > > changing all these lines twice
> > >
> > > But looks better to me.
> >
> > So... do you suggest to squash with request/reliquish locality stuff?
> > Just checking because this is 1/3 :)
>
> Hm, maybe my mailer went wrong, but I saw the original patch right
> before this one.. Never mind
I did format-patch -o to the same folder where I had the first series so
I posted the RFC patches by accident. Sorry. Should always do --dry-run.
> Jason
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists