linux-kernel - Re: latest version of bluetooth for n950?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161011214139.cgxe2ms7qjgruuxb@earth>
Date:   Tue, 11 Oct 2016 23:41:40 +0200
From:   Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     pali.rohar@...il.com, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, tony@...mide.com, khilman@...nel.org,
        aaro.koskinen@....fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com,
        patrikbachan@...il.com, serge@...lyn.com
Subject: Re: latest version of bluetooth for n950?

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 04:51:40PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:47:04AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > I got some free cycles to play with n900 and bluetooth. There's still
> > some unrelated config option that breaks even the old vesion of
> > patches, but I'm ready for more debugging now.
> > 
> > Could I have the latest version of the (clean) bluetooth patch? I have
> > feeling it might work with the right config option, and would like to
> > try.
> > 
> > For the record, here's working .config and the tricky tricky oneliner
> > that took me week to figure out.
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/sre/linux-n900.git/log/?h=n950-bluetooth
> 
> My local branch is based on 4.8 and fixes a few of Marcel's
> comments. I'm currently at ELCE, but I will push my local
> stuff later in the hotel after verifying, that it works as
> expected (luckily I brought N950 with me :)).

It does not. Rebasing the pushed branch to v4.8 works, so the
problem is somewhere in my new changes. I will try to have a
look at it tomorrow.

The changes shouldn't affect you for any tests, though. Just
take the branch from above (and optionally rebase to v4.8).

-- Sebastian



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)