linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/8] PM / OPP: Allow platform specific custom opp_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Oct 2016 00:26:32 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     nm@...com, sboyd@...eaurora.org, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
        linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, robh@...nel.org,
        d-gerlach@...com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] PM / OPP: Allow platform specific custom opp_set_rate() callbacks

On Wednesday, October 05, 2016 06:59:29 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 04-10-16, 17:26, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pm_opp.h b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> > +int dev_pm_opp_register_set_rate_helper(struct device *dev,
> > +	int (*set_rate)(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_set_rate_data *data))
> > +{
> > +	return -ENOTSUPP;
> > +}
> 
> + this to fix up a warning:
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_opp.h b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> index ef882ed24b0e..483f33e70895 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static inline int dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw(struct device *dev,
>  
>  static inline void dev_pm_opp_put_supported_hw(struct device *dev) {}
>  
> -int dev_pm_opp_register_set_rate_helper(struct device *dev,
> +static inline int dev_pm_opp_register_set_rate_helper(struct device *dev,
>         int (*set_rate)(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_set_rate_data *data))
>  {
>         return -ENOTSUPP;
> 
> 

Can you resend the full patch, please?

Thanks,
Rafael