linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] mm/percpu.c: fix memory leakage issue when allocate a odd alignment area

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Oct 2016 11:54:39 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     zijun_hu <zijun_hu@...o.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zijun_hu@....com,
        tj@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, cl@...ux.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] mm/percpu.c: fix memory leakage issue when
 allocate a odd alignment area

On Wed 12-10-16 16:44:31, zijun_hu wrote:
> On 10/12/2016 04:25 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 12-10-16 15:24:33, zijun_hu wrote:
[...]
> >> i found the following code segments in mm/vmalloc.c
> >> static struct vmap_area *alloc_vmap_area(unsigned long size,
> >>                                 unsigned long align,
> >>                                 unsigned long vstart, unsigned long vend,
> >>                                 int node, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> >> {
> >> ...
> >>
> >>         BUG_ON(!size);
> >>         BUG_ON(offset_in_page(size));
> >>         BUG_ON(!is_power_of_2(align));
> > 
> > See a recent Linus rant about BUG_ONs. These BUG_ONs are quite old and
> > from a quick look they are even unnecessary. So rather than adding more
> > of those, I think removing those that are not needed is much more
> > preferred.
> >
> i notice that, and the above code segments is used to illustrate that
> input parameter checking is necessary sometimes

Why do you think it is necessary here?

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs