linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: at91: properly handle LPDDR poweroff

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161012111704.5mhtu4pjv2vncam5@piout.net>
Date:   Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:17:04 +0200
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: at91: properly handle LPDDR poweroff

On 10/10/2016 at 08:00:30 +0200, Alexander Stein wrote :
> Hi Alexandre,
> 
> On Friday 07 October 2016 18:34:25, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This patch set improves LPDDR support on SoCs using the Atmel MPDDR
> > controller.
> > 
> > LPDDR memoris can only handle up to 400 uncontrolled power offs in their
> > life. The proper power off sequence has to be applied before shutting down
> > the SoC.
> > 
> > I'm not too happy with the code duplication but this is a design choice
> > that has been made before because both shitdown controler are really
>                                          ^^^^^^^^
> 
> I guess you mean shutdown? :) Same for the suject of 2nd patch.
> 

I'm planning to send a v2, hopefully fixing my typos ;)

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com