| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:33:52 +0800
From: lizf@...nel.org
To: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Karl Heiss <kheiss@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.4 116/125] sctp: Prevent soft lockup when sctp_accept() is called during a timeout event
From: Karl Heiss <kheiss@...il.com>
3.4.113-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
commit 635682a14427d241bab7bbdeebb48a7d7b91638e upstream.
A case can occur when sctp_accept() is called by the user during
a heartbeat timeout event after the 4-way handshake. Since
sctp_assoc_migrate() changes both assoc->base.sk and assoc->ep, the
bh_sock_lock in sctp_generate_heartbeat_event() will be taken with
the listening socket but released with the new association socket.
The result is a deadlock on any future attempts to take the listening
socket lock.
Note that this race can occur with other SCTP timeouts that take
the bh_lock_sock() in the event sctp_accept() is called.
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#9 stuck for 67s! [swapper:0]
...
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8152d48e>] [<ffffffff8152d48e>] _spin_lock+0x1e/0x30
RSP: 0018:ffff880028323b20 EFLAGS: 00000206
RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff880028323b20 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff880028323be0 RDI: ffff8804632c4b48
RBP: ffffffff8100bb93 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffff880610662280 R11: 0000000000000100 R12: ffff880028323aa0
R13: ffff8804383c3880 R14: ffff880028323a90 R15: ffffffff81534225
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880028320000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 00000000006df528 CR3: 0000000001a85000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo ffff880616b70000, task ffff880616b6cab0)
Stack:
ffff880028323c40 ffffffffa01c2582 ffff880614cfb020 0000000000000000
<d> 0100000000000000 00000014383a6c44 ffff8804383c3880 ffff880614e93c00
<d> ffff880614e93c00 0000000000000000 ffff8804632c4b00 ffff8804383c38b8
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
[<ffffffffa01c2582>] ? sctp_rcv+0x492/0xa10 [sctp]
[<ffffffff8148c559>] ? nf_iterate+0x69/0xb0
[<ffffffff814974a0>] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0x0/0x2d0
[<ffffffff8148c716>] ? nf_hook_slow+0x76/0x120
[<ffffffff814974a0>] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0x0/0x2d0
[<ffffffff8149757d>] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0xdd/0x2d0
[<ffffffff81497808>] ? ip_local_deliver+0x98/0xa0
[<ffffffff81496ccd>] ? ip_rcv_finish+0x12d/0x440
[<ffffffff81497255>] ? ip_rcv+0x275/0x350
[<ffffffff8145cfeb>] ? __netif_receive_skb+0x4ab/0x750
...
With lockdep debugging:
=====================================
[ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
-------------------------------------
CslRx/12087 is trying to release lock (slock-AF_INET) at:
[<ffffffffa01bcae0>] sctp_generate_timeout_event+0x40/0xe0 [sctp]
but there are no more locks to release!
other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by CslRx/12087:
#0: (&asoc->timers[i]){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffff8108ce1f>] run_timer_softirq+0x16f/0x3e0
#1: (slock-AF_INET){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffffa01bcac3>] sctp_generate_timeout_event+0x23/0xe0 [sctp]
Ensure the socket taken is also the same one that is released by
saving a copy of the socket before entering the timeout event
critical section.
Signed-off-by: Karl Heiss <kheiss@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
- Net namespaces are not used
- Keep using sctp_bh_{,un}lock_sock()
- Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
---
net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
index 5fa033a..06c75b1 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
@@ -249,11 +249,12 @@ void sctp_generate_t3_rtx_event(unsigned long peer)
int error;
struct sctp_transport *transport = (struct sctp_transport *) peer;
struct sctp_association *asoc = transport->asoc;
+ struct sock *sk = asoc->base.sk;
/* Check whether a task is in the sock. */
- sctp_bh_lock_sock(asoc->base.sk);
- if (sock_owned_by_user(asoc->base.sk)) {
+ sctp_bh_lock_sock(sk);
+ if (sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("%s:Sock is busy.\n", __func__);
/* Try again later. */
@@ -276,10 +277,10 @@ void sctp_generate_t3_rtx_event(unsigned long peer)
transport, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (error)
- asoc->base.sk->sk_err = -error;
+ sk->sk_err = -error;
out_unlock:
- sctp_bh_unlock_sock(asoc->base.sk);
+ sctp_bh_unlock_sock(sk);
sctp_transport_put(transport);
}
@@ -289,10 +290,11 @@ out_unlock:
static void sctp_generate_timeout_event(struct sctp_association *asoc,
sctp_event_timeout_t timeout_type)
{
+ struct sock *sk = asoc->base.sk;
int error = 0;
- sctp_bh_lock_sock(asoc->base.sk);
- if (sock_owned_by_user(asoc->base.sk)) {
+ sctp_bh_lock_sock(sk);
+ if (sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("%s:Sock is busy: timer %d\n",
__func__,
timeout_type);
@@ -316,10 +318,10 @@ static void sctp_generate_timeout_event(struct sctp_association *asoc,
(void *)timeout_type, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (error)
- asoc->base.sk->sk_err = -error;
+ sk->sk_err = -error;
out_unlock:
- sctp_bh_unlock_sock(asoc->base.sk);
+ sctp_bh_unlock_sock(sk);
sctp_association_put(asoc);
}
@@ -369,9 +371,10 @@ void sctp_generate_heartbeat_event(unsigned long data)
int error = 0;
struct sctp_transport *transport = (struct sctp_transport *) data;
struct sctp_association *asoc = transport->asoc;
+ struct sock *sk = asoc->base.sk;
- sctp_bh_lock_sock(asoc->base.sk);
- if (sock_owned_by_user(asoc->base.sk)) {
+ sctp_bh_lock_sock(sk);
+ if (sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("%s:Sock is busy.\n", __func__);
/* Try again later. */
@@ -392,10 +395,10 @@ void sctp_generate_heartbeat_event(unsigned long data)
transport, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (error)
- asoc->base.sk->sk_err = -error;
+ sk->sk_err = -error;
out_unlock:
- sctp_bh_unlock_sock(asoc->base.sk);
+ sctp_bh_unlock_sock(sk);
sctp_transport_put(transport);
}
@@ -406,9 +409,10 @@ void sctp_generate_proto_unreach_event(unsigned long data)
{
struct sctp_transport *transport = (struct sctp_transport *) data;
struct sctp_association *asoc = transport->asoc;
+ struct sock *sk = asoc->base.sk;
- sctp_bh_lock_sock(asoc->base.sk);
- if (sock_owned_by_user(asoc->base.sk)) {
+ sctp_bh_lock_sock(sk);
+ if (sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("%s:Sock is busy.\n", __func__);
/* Try again later. */
@@ -429,7 +433,7 @@ void sctp_generate_proto_unreach_event(unsigned long data)
asoc->state, asoc->ep, asoc, transport, GFP_ATOMIC);
out_unlock:
- sctp_bh_unlock_sock(asoc->base.sk);
+ sctp_bh_unlock_sock(sk);
sctp_association_put(asoc);
}
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists