linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] man/set_mempolicy.2,mbind.2: add MPOL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKgNAkjLLLkyU1-H_ur802o=mNnpOC0XAb_3TPRSc-RuRNYZFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:35:26 +0200
From:   "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To:     Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:     Piotr Kwapulinski <kwapulinski.piotr@...il.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, mhocko@...nel.org,
        mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
        Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@...il.com>, nzimmer@....com,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>,
        jmarchan@...hat.com, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        SeokHoon Yoon <iamyooon@...il.com>, n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] man/set_mempolicy.2,mbind.2: add MPOL_LOCAL NUMA
 memory policy documentation

Hi Christoph,

On 12 October 2016 at 16:08, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>
>> > +arguments must specify the empty set. If the "local node" is low
>> > +on free memory the kernel will try to allocate memory from other
>> > +nodes. The kernel will allocate memory from the "local node"
>> > +whenever memory for this node is available. If the "local node"
>> > +is not allowed by the process's current cpuset context the kernel
>> > +will try to allocate memory from other nodes. The kernel will
>> > +allocate memory from the "local node" whenever it becomes allowed
>> > +by the process's current cpuset context. In contrast
>> > +.B MPOL_DEFAULT
>> > +reverts to the policy of the process which may have been set with
>> > +.BR set_mempolicy (2).
>> > +It may not be the "local allocation".
>>
>> What is the sense of "may not be" here? (And repeated below).
>> Is the meaning "this could be something other than"?
>> Presumably the answer is yes, in which case I'll clarify
>> the wording there. Let me know.
>
> Someone may have set for example a round robin policy with numactl
> --interleave before starting the process? Then allocations will go through
> all nodes.

So the sense is then "this could be something other than", right?

Cheers,

Michael

-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/