[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1476288961.16823.11.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:16:01 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux.git: printk() problem
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 08:47 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
< We'll see. But the other issues are easily fixed by just adding
> KERN_CONT where appropriate. It was actually very much what you were
> supposed to do before too, if only as a marker to others that "yes,
> I'm actually doing this, and no, I'm not supposed to have a log level"
> (but with the new world order you actually *can* combine KERN_CONT
> with a loglevel, so that if the beginning od the line got flushed, the
> continuation can still be printed with the right log level).
I think that might not be a good idea.
Anything that uses a KERN_CONT with a new log level
might as well be converted into multiple printks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists