[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161013085739.GA19151@b29397-desktop>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 16:57:39 +0800
From: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@...il.com>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Peter Chen <peter.chen@....com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
broonie@...nel.org, sre@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, dbaryshkov@...il.com, dwmw3@...radead.org,
k.kozlowski@...sung.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
mail@...iej.szmigiero.name, troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com,
festevam@...il.com, oscar@...andei.net, stephen.boyd@...aro.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, stillcompiling@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mka@...omium.org,
vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] power: add power sequence library
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 09:04:42AM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > > > +static int __init pwrseq_generic_register(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct pwrseq_generic *pwrseq_gen;
> > > > + int i;
> > > > +
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_PWRSEQ_GENERIC_INSTANCE_NUMBER; i++) {
> > > > + pwrseq_gen = kzalloc(sizeof(*pwrseq_gen), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > + if (!pwrseq_gen)
> > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > > +
> > > > + pwrseq_gen->pwrseq.pwrseq_of_match_table = generic_id_table;
> > > > + pwrseq_gen->pwrseq.get = pwrseq_generic_get;
> > > > + pwrseq_gen->pwrseq.on = pwrseq_generic_on;
> > > > + pwrseq_gen->pwrseq.off = pwrseq_generic_off;
> > > > + pwrseq_gen->pwrseq.put = pwrseq_generic_put;
> > > > + pwrseq_gen->pwrseq.free = pwrseq_generic_free;
> > > > +
> > > > + pwrseq_register(&pwrseq_gen->pwrseq);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +postcore_initcall(pwrseq_generic_register)
> > >
> > > I see that you need to have it preallocated for the compatible matching,
> > > but wouldn't it also work to either just register the type and allocate
> > > dynamically or otherwise just allocate a new spare everytime
> > > pwrseq_generic_get() picks up the previous spare?
> >
> > Before compatible matching, the host driver doesn't know which pwrseq type
> > for its child node, then doesn't know which pwrseq instance needs to be
> > allocated. From dts, we don't know which pwrseq type for the node.
>
> yes, that is why I was suggesting allocating one (or two) here in
> pwrseq_generic_register() and every time pwrseq_generic_get() grabs the last
> free sequence instance, you allocate a new free spare one in that function.
Good idea.
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists